4/19/2023 0 Comments Meta threads![]() ![]() Maron was in the early scenes of 25th episode of first season of Phantom Thief Jeanne.Įdited by sohibil on Mar 17th 2023 at 1:51:58 PM if the woman is wearing a bra or a bikini top underneath, like I also vaguelly remember Nobue of Strawberry Marshmallow wearing a shirt like this on at lest one occassion to emphasize her phlegmatic careless nature and they don't necessarily have to be NSFW e.g. I definitely do know that there are some female examples of this hint the page image. I also don't like how the final paragraph of the description tries to hammer in that it's Always Male trope. Is this trope played for fanservice? Is it supposed to be an indication of the situation getting intimate? What kind of information does Intimate Open Shirt convey? Tropes are supposed to convey information to the audience. ![]() I mean what's the trope actually supposed to be about. The description is kind of confusing and does not fit with the examples much. I'm detecting a problem with Intimate Open Shirt. But does the page need TRS, or just crosslinking, adding examples from other tropes, and a trip to the Trope Description Improvement Drive to clarify the scope? If it does need TRS, should I perform a usage check on Reimagining the Artifact and Adaptational Context Change to determine the scope of any overlap between the three tropes and inform any decision to create a supertrope? Also, it is Not Thriving, and while a lot of examples aren't crosslinked, by my count crosslinking them would come up just short of getting it out of Starving, though mining the other tropes for examples should bring it over the top - though that means if we try to adhere to what TNTRS wants it to be that probably means cutting and yarding. On the other hand, these distinctions do kind of feel like I'm splitting hairs, and I do kind of wonder if restricting it to names is a bit arbitrarily specific there may be room for a larger supertrope about any change in the meaning or context of any element of the work that could absorb part or all of, or serve as a supertrope to, Adaptational Context Change. ![]() ![]() (Notably, someone suggested an in-universe example in the original TLP thread and the sponsor expressed misgivings but eventually added it to the draft themselves.) As for the concerns about overlap, Adaptational Context Change seems to be primarily about changes that affect the meaning for the viewer, while most of the examples on Name-Meaning Change seem to exist just to have a meaning, and there also aren't many examples that were changed because they were outdated or embarrassing, minimizing the overlap with Reimagining the Artifact as well. The thing is, I'm not sure the issues raised there are really problems obviously any trope can have in-universe examples, though the fact neither this page nor the ones it's being compared to are Trivia weakens that argument since they'd all be on the main trope list, and in this case an in-universe example might be a way of enacting an out-of-universe example, meaning the lines would necessarily be blurred. I'm torn about what to do about Name-Meaning Change which turned three years old, and thus hit the point where its 13 (now 14) references qualify it for Starving, just this past Friday, and which was already on Tropes Needing TRS in the Misused folder. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |